当前位置:首页 > 产品中心 > Will this debate change anyone’s mind?

Will this debate change anyone’s mind?

2024-09-22 09:50:18 [行业动态] 来源:影视网站起名字

Jordan Weissmann:Jim, we just watched a debate where two septugenarian candidates for the American presidency sniped at each other relentlessly for an hour and 30 minutes. The Grumpy Old Men GIFs have been flying all night on Twitter. Trump yet again declined an opportunity to condemn generic white supremacists and maybe gave a shout out to the Proud Boys. Jake Tapper just described the whole thing as a “hot mess inside a dumpster fire inside a train wreck.”

And yet, I’m weirdly feeling hopeful for our country after all that, because for most of the night, Trump seemed like a bellicose asshole, and Biden appeared generally together, on message, and empathetic, which is all he really needs to maintain his lead. Am I being too optimistic?

Advertisement

Jim Newell:I guess I’d take issue with the idea that they sniped relentlessly at each other for an hour and 30 minutes. Trump sniped relentlessly at Biden for that long, Chris Wallace sniped at Trump, and Biden was able to complete about 62 percent of each talking point he started. It made me think about the first Republican presidential debate Trump participated in in 2015, and how wildly funny it seemed at the time that he was being the way he was. Memories!

There was nothing funny about anything tonight, and it wouldn’t surprise me if Biden pulls out of the next two debates.

I didn’t think Biden was at his best. He seemed too caught up in remembering his prepared answers, or useless stats that he could just paraphrase. Trump trying to throw him off his train of thought was the right strategy. But Trump was absolutely out of his mind. We’ll see what polls say but my interpretation is: This fires up his base and worsens his problems among those who were drifting away from him specifically because he is a priceless asshole.

Advertisement

Does any Memorable Highlight Moment stand out for you, or is it all a blur of arguments about the time clock?

Weissmann:I, in turn, would take issue with the idea that there was nothing funny about tonight. I actually belly-laughed early on when Biden finally cracked and said, “Will you shut up, man?” And when I got done laughing, I realized that I had just experienced a very cathartic moment of Democratic wish fulfillment. A lot of liberals have been waiting for someone to talk back directly like that to Trump since he became president, which isn’t an uncommon feeling among members of an opposition party. (Remember Clint Eastwood and that Obama-empty chair?) And when Biden did it, he actually seemed to snap out a bit from his slow early start, where he was mostly fumbling his way quietly through talking points.

Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement

It didn’t help Trump that his attempts to be vicious in return often sounded way off-key, like when he basically called Biden an idiot (“there’s nothing smart about you”) and reminded everyone that the well-liked ex-VP attended a state school. He was trying to point out that Biden couldn’t remember its name properly, but it came off as classist, and kind of reinforced the whole Scranton vs. Park Avenue theme Biden’s been hitting on lately.

I also expect that Trump’s surreal failure to condemn white supremacists and militias, literally the easiest thing you can do in politics, is going to live on, just because it plays into the criticisms of him that already exist. What did you even make of that?

Advertisement

Newell:What did he say, “stand down, stand by,” in a very sarcastic, wink-wink voice? Of course he did that, it’s what he does. What made it chilling was the way he complemented that later in the debate by talking about the need for his poll watchers to challenge voters in Philadelphia, and elsewhere, and his refusal to urge his supporters to resist street violence when mail votes are going to be counted in the days after the election. It’s not just the failure to condemn, it’s the failure to condemn because strategically he’s planning on unrest during the counting of mail votes.

Advertisement

Weissmann:Right. Trump literally told the Proud Boys—an actual group of white racist hooligans—to “stand down and stand by.”

Advertisement

Newell:On the Trump-couldn’t-stop-interrupting front, I just heard Jake Tapper faulting Chris Wallace for losing control of the debate early and not taking the reins until too late. I always love one TV man sticking it to a rival. But I don’t really know what else Chris Wallace was supposed to do? I thought he was pretty forceful throughout the debate, in every conceivable way short of turning off a mic, that Trump needed to shut the fuck up. What did you make of Wallace’s inability to keep control? Was there anything else he could do?

Advertisement

Weissmann:He did what he could, and what he could do was spend the evening quarreling with the president. I think much of the right-wing media—though maybe not Fox, since Wallace works there—is going to accuse him of being biased,and perhaps try to preemptively bully the next moderator to go easy on Trump. And at points, he really did let his evident frustration with Trump slip, such as toward the end when he chuckled and agreed with Biden that it was hard to remember what Trump had even just said. To be honest, if I were a dedicated Republican, I would probably be pissed that the moderator spent most of the night coming to Biden’s aid. But then again, Trump could have kept quieter and been more effective, especially since Biden tends to trip on his words when he goes on for a full paragraph. For a guy who Republicans claim has lost a step, Biden was much better in their back-and-forth duels.

Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement

Do you think there was anything that happened during this debate that would have actually changed someone’s mind about a candidate, though?

More on 2020 Campaign

  1. So, What Was the Guy Behind 2020 “Stolen Election” Theories in Georgia Up to With Guests in His Bathroom?
  2. The One Story About Trump That Jack Smith Needs to Tell at the Supreme Court
  3. The Most Dangerous Time in 2024 Will Be Just After the Election
  4. A Capitol Rioter Has Become a Right-Wing Media Darling. She Just Got Arrested.

Newell:It felt like, if you were still a swing voter at this point—all 70 of you out there—this just reinforces the cross-pressures. Say you like or are OK with the administration’s policies but also think he’s a total asshole who shouldn’t be in charge of anything. This reaffirmed all of that.

I thought, if Trump had a message with some juice tonight, it was—and I can’t remember the exact words, and it is actually impossible to transcribe this debate—look at all the shit that’s been thrown my way on a daily basis, but I just put it aside and built a strong economy and will rebuild one after COVID, too. Then, to name just one example, while Biden is talking about his son Beau dying of cancer, Trump interrupts to talk about cokehead Hunter. It’s just so … cruel. Eventually those remaining swing voters will have to make a choice, but I don’t see how tonight makes it easier. I don’t see why anyone already committed to a candidate would change based on tonight.

Advertisement Advertisement

I mean, I’m looking at this first CBS instapoll after the debate about who won it and … Biden +7. Almost exactly the national polling margin.

Advertisement

Weissmann:I mean, Donald Trump fought with the press, praised himself because 2 million Americans haven’t die of the coronavirus, seemed to once again disagree with his own scientific team, called his opponent an idiot, declined to say a bad word about racists, and suggested he would only lose the election if it was rigged—all of which are pretty much par for the course. Biden basically looked at the camera and said, “Can you believe this clown?” (I’m paraphrasing, but only sort of.)

Newell:In that way, maybe Wallace didn’t fail, and the debate served its purpose: showing us what kind of people the two people running for president are.

Weissmann: And voters were unmoved. According to CNN’s poll, 60 percent of viewers think Biden won, but 57 percent said the debate didn’t make them more likely to vote for one or the other. It appears that most voters know what there is to know about these men.

Tweet Share Share Comment

(责任编辑:行业动态)

推荐文章
  • Apple Watch 10 rumors: Everything we know so far

    Apple Watch 10 rumors: Everything we know so far Apple Watch Series 10, also called "Apple Watch 10" or "Apple Watch X" among tech enthusiasts, shoul ...[详细]
  • 诗润雅州春意盛 飞花雅令送祝福

    诗润雅州春意盛  飞花雅令送祝福 本报讯1月27日,由雅安市作家协会和雨城区民宗局、雅安市佛教协会联合举办的迎春诗会在雨城区澄清寺举行。诗会上,钟渔、刘江岳、黑辞、王进等雅安诗人和嘉宾声情并茂地朗诵了自己创作或喜爱的经典诗歌,并通过古 ...[详细]
  • 2024年雅安网络春晚7日首播

    2024年雅安网络春晚7日首播 本报讯2024年雅安市第十届网络春节联欢晚会以下简称:2024年雅安网络春晚),将于2月7日19:30在雅安市融媒体中心“云小雅”新闻平台手机客户端首播。2024年雅安网络春晚以“绿美雅安E路有你”为 ...[详细]
  • 多彩活动贺新春 热热闹闹氛围浓

    多彩活动贺新春   热热闹闹氛围浓 书法爱好者们为居民写春联本报讯春节将至,年味渐浓。2月1日上午,雅安经开区在永兴街道开展“我们的节日·春节”主题志愿服务活动,通过丰富多彩的活动,为当地群众奉上“文化大餐”的同时,也向他们送去浓浓的新 ...[详细]
  • South Korea beefs up drills amid escalating NK provocations

    South Korea beefs up drills amid escalating NK provocations A Spike missile is launched during the South Korean Marine Corps' full-scale live-fire drills on the ...[详细]
  • 开展防范非法集资宣传 守牢群众“钱袋子”

    开展防范非法集资宣传  守牢群众“钱袋子” 本报讯近日,市人民检察院会同市金融工作局、市法院、市公安局等部门,在人民银行雅安市分行金融教育示范基地,开展以“守住钱袋子·护好幸福家”为主题的防范非法集资现场宣传活动。活动旨在从源头上防范化解非法集 ...[详细]
  • 铆足干劲抓发展 奋力实现“开门红”

    铆足干劲抓发展  奋力实现“开门红” 机器不停歇、工人不停工、原料不断供、内销外销不断流……进入2024年以来,雅化集团各生产基地生产经营呈现出一派热火朝天的繁忙景象。2024年是中华人民共和国成立75周年,是实现“十四五”规划目标任务的 ...[详细]
  • 文艺表演庆佳节 砥砺奋进谱新篇

    文艺表演庆佳节  砥砺奋进谱新篇 本报讯近日,雅安市人民医院四川大学华西医院雅安医院)以下简称:市人民医院)“奋进新征程医起向未来”2024年春节文艺晚会举行。市卫健委相关负责人、市人民医院领导班子、康定市人民医院参演嘉宾和市人民医院 ...[详细]
  • Families of S. Korean detainees in NK appeal to embassies for support

    Families of S. Korean detainees in NK appeal to embassies for support Lee Shin-wha, former ambassador for international cooperation on North Korean human rights (center), ...[详细]
  • 2024年雅安市“金熊猫”系列篮球赛举行

    2024年雅安市“金熊猫”系列篮球赛举行 近日,由雅安市体育发展中心、荥经县文化体育和旅游局联合举办的2024年雅安市“金熊猫”系列篮球赛在荥经县体育馆开赛,来自全市8个县区)100余名篮球爱好者参加比赛。此次赛事以赛为媒,通过“体育+”的模 ...[详细]
热点阅读