Israel's latest Iran strike brings a rare bit of calming news.
A rare bit of calming news from the Middle East: It seems that neither Israel nor Iran wants to widen the war.
The odds of a direct conflict between the region’s two most powerful countries seemed high for much of this month. On April 1, Israel attacked Iran’s consulate in Syria, killing seven senior officers of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. On April 13, Iran retaliated by launching a massive, multipronged attack—more than 300 missiles and drones, including 110 ballistic missiles—against Israel. Almost all the incoming weapons were shot down (a remarkable feat by U.S., Israeli, British, French, and Jordanian air defenses), no one was killed, and very little damage was sustained, and at just one air base. Still, the attack, which couldhave been deadly, marked the first time Iran had ever attacked Israeli territory. Israel felt the need to do somethingin response.
In the wee hours on Friday, three drones flew over an air base in the Isfahan district of southern Iran, not very far from a critical nuclear facility. Iran says they were all shot down. Maybe so, maybe not. The key facts are these: Israel has not acknowledged launching the drones—nor has Iran accused Israel of doing so. In fact, one senior Iranian official blamed the deed on “infiltrators” who fired the drones from inside Iran.
The point is, the widespread fears of mutual escalation—one airstrike sparking another, which sparks another, then another, on and on, for reasons of revenge, pride, a compulsion to “restore deterrence,” or whatever—have proved baseless, at least for now.
AdvertisementAfter the Saturday night air raid, an Iranian official warned Israel not to retaliate. Even a small Israeli attack, he said, would trigger a much more massive counterstrike from Tehran. President Biden urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to heed the warning. Most Israelis felt they had to do something to deter future Iranian attacks. They wound up doing about as little as a powerfully armed country can do while still doing something—and Iran pretended that Israel didn’t launch the attack anyway, thus evading their pledge to respond to any such attack massively.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementIn sum, Iran proved that it can mount a massive attack on Israel, while Israel proved that its weapons have the range to strike targets inside Iran. That seemed to be enough for both sides. The equilibrium has thus been restored, at least for now.
AdvertisementAs of midday Friday, the Israeli government seemed content to go along with the game, declining to comment on the drone strike. An exception was Itamar Ben-Gvir, the ultra-right-wing national security minister, who had pushed for a much more forceful response. “Lame!” he tweeted Friday morning in reference to the three-drone airstrike—thus acknowledging that Israel had launched the attack and that some senior officials wanted to do more. Netanyahu usually endorses Ben-Gvir’s radically hawkish statements, or at least doesn’t dispute them. But this time, Channel 12, Israel’s leading TV news station, reported that officials in the prime minister’s inner circle are very upset with the tweet, saying that it damaged Israel’s national security and slamming Ben-Gvir generally as “childish” and “irrelevant to any discussion.”
AdvertisementMeanwhile, the aftereffects of Iran’s attack last weekend continue to benefit Israel. On Wednesday, 48 countries signed a statement condemning Iran for its attack on Israel. The palpable sign of Israel’s continued vulnerability is also likely to boost approval of President Biden’s emergency military-aid package, which the House will take up on Saturday. Before the attack, many of those countries would have been reluctant to endorse any expression of support for Israel—and Biden’s aid package was losing support—as a result of Israel’s “over-the-top” military tactics (as even Biden called them) in Gaza.
AdvertisementThe prospect of a major war between Iran and Israel distracted the world’s focus from the fighting and suffering in Gaza, but probably not for long. U.S. and Israeli officials remain locked in disagreement over how to rout the last battalion of Hamas terrorists from the town of Rafah on Gaza’s southern tip, where more than 1 million civilians—most of them refugees from the northern towns—are crowded, many of them starving. Netanyahu and the other members of his war Cabinet want to mount a major offensive against Rafah. Biden and his aides urge them not to take that step unless they come up with a way to avoid killing tens of thousands of the civilians. The Israelis have not come up with any such way. Nor have the Americans thought up a way to rout Hamas’ last battalion without an armed offensive.
Advertisement AdvertisementThis is why U.S., Egyptian, and Qatari diplomats continue to hammer out a plan for a cease-fire, combined with an exchange of Israeli hostages held by Hamas for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel. Hamas has rejected several proposals, most of them endorsed by Israel. Its one counteroffer—a cease-fire that delays the release of any hostages until all Israeli troops have withdrawn from Gaza—is unacceptable to Israel.
Advertisement AdvertisementRelated From Slate
Fred Kaplan
What Trump Really Means When He Says He Would End the War in Gaza “Quickly”
Read MorePopular in News & Politics
- The Lawyer Defending Idaho’s Abortion Ban Irritated the One Justice He Needed on His Side
- You Don’t Want to Know How It’s Going Between Trump’s Lawyers and the Judge Presiding Over His Criminal Case
- We’ve Been Entertaining an Illusion About the Supreme Court. It’s Finally Been Shattered.
- Prosecutors Are Finally Revealing Their Strategy Against Trump
Meanwhile, U.S. and Saudi officials have revived the idea, first discussed nine months ago, of a grand bargain in which the U.S. provides security guarantees to Saudi Arabia, the Saudis establish formal diplomatic relations with Israel, and Israel takes the first steps toward recognizing a Palestinian state, preferably a demilitarized one with a new Palestinian Authority. The Saudis have since relaxed the final condition to a verbal declaration by Israel that it will simply renew talks about a two-state solution to the long-festering “Palestinian problem.” However, Netanyahu is leery even of paying lip service to the idea—partly because he is against it, partly because even doing that much would alienate the far-right members of his governing coalition. If just five members resign as a result, new elections would be called, and polls indicate he would lose.
This is the state of things: Every party with an interest in the region wants this grand deal—cease-fire, hostage exchange, and talks toward a Palestinian state—except for Israel and Hamas, the war’s two combatants. Little progress is likely to happen without pressure on them from outside powers—the U.S. on Israel, Qatar on Hamas. The current, transitory relaxation of tensions between Israel and Iran, as well as revived talks about a Saudi grand bargain, creates some breathing room for the diplomats. Will any of it matter? That’s the question.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:行业动态)
- 提前谋划部署准备秋季开学
- Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, and winning with New York values.
- The tragedy of Antonin Scalia.
- Emmys 2018: The full list of nominations
- Republicans on abortion
- Coach jailed for sexual exploitation of underage athlete
- North Koreans exposed to gruesome human rights abuses in pretrial detention: rights group
- Jeb Bush, Donald Trump clash over George W. Bush's record.
- Here's what we learned from Travis Kalanick's hidden 2007 Twitter account
- Abrar Ahmed returns as Pakistan names squad for second Test against Bangladesh
- 房屋装修伤人由谁承担责任,签订装修合同应注意什么?
- Families separated at the border can't afford to be reunited. Here's how you can help.
- Trump will keep winning as long as Cruz and Rubio remain.
-
Swifties for Kamala raises over $100,000 in donations for Harris campaign
An estimated 27,000 Swifties gathered last night, not for the Eras Tour, but to rally for the electi ...[详细] -
Sacha Baron Cohen got a bunch of GOP congressmen to say arming toddlers is a good idea
Am I surprised that a bunch of Republican congressman endorsed arming toddlers? No. But, as usual, I ...[详细] -
The first giant dinosaur was a huge weirdo
You're standing in a lush forest 230 million years ago in what is now Argentina. You're alone among ...[详细] -
Almost 80 percent of 2017's ICOs were scams
Initial coin offerings are the way of the future, and oh boy is that future shady. A new study found ...[详细] -
Which iPad Model Is Right for You?
With class-leading hardware and optimized software, the Apple iPad line has long been the default ta ...[详细] -
一般情况下,购房者在买房后,都会根据自己的意愿对房屋进行装修,而由此引发的纠纷也越来越多,如:因装修而伤人等。那么,在法律上,若房屋装修伤了人应该由谁承担责任呢?此外,在实践中,签订装修合同应注意什么 ...[详细]
-
范超是荥经县泗坪乡断机村8组村民。“4·20”芦山强烈地震,他家的房屋受损严重,范超一家也因此开始了灾后重建。如今,范超家与村里40户受灾重建户的新房一道,成为断机村的一大亮点。就在建成新家,搬进新房 ...[详细]
-
I can’t hate Donald Trump. I do hate the Republicans who’ve enabled him.
I can’t bring myself to hate Donald Trump. Part of this is a quirk of biography. Like a lot of nativ ...[详细] -
市民填写献血相关表格8月22日晚,雨城区正黄时代天街广场天桥旁停靠着一辆献血车,身穿红马甲的志愿者们正向路过的市民发放无偿献血宣传手册,不少市民停下脚步,参与无偿献血。这是雅安市中心血站开启夜间献血模 ...[详细]
-
North Korea steps up virus control along inter
In this Nov. 15, 2020, file photo provided by the North Korean government, North Korean leader Kim J ...[详细]
- Echo Dot (5th gen) deal — get it for $29.99 at Amazon
- Video: The View audience loves Bernie Sanders.
- 'Who is this for' meme asks the questions on everyone's mind
- ABC Republican debate preview: Donald Trump returns.
- Foreign, multicultural students rise amid declining school population
- Donald Trump switched to an iPhone and that call for an Apple boycott seems so far away now
- These photos of England’s manager hugging his wife post