PDF fail reveals Facebook considered selling access to data
It turns out Facebook did at one point consider selling its users' data.
We now know this not because Facebook executives had a sudden urge for transparency, but because of a bungled PDF that wasn't properly redacted.
SEE ALSO:Mark Zuckerberg believes Facebook is at 'war,' report saysThat error, which was reported by ArsTechnica, resulted in a number of email exchanges among Facebook employees being unintentionally made public. The court documents, which stem from a 2015 lawsuit against Facebook by a developer called Six4Three, are currently at the center of an inquiry by UK government officials into Facebook's data privacy practices.
The newly discovered and not-actually-redacted portions reveal that the social network did toy with the idea of giving big corporations deeper access to Facebook's data if they spent large sums of money on advertising.
Ultimately, Facebook didn't formally pursue these types of arrangements. In a statement provided to Mashable, the company's director of developer platforms and programs, Konstantinos Papamiltiadis, called the emails "misleading" and noted that Facebook has never charged developers for access to its platform.
That these emails were made public in the first place, though, is yet another embarrassing example of what can go wrong when PDF editing software isn't used properly.
ArsTechnica reporter Cyrus Farivar unearthed the supposedly redacted text when he literally copied and pasted it into a text editor. "Ars was able to access pages of blacked-out text simply by copying and pasting them into a text editor," he wrote. (The full document is available here.)
And while we don't know what exactly went wrong that made it so embarrassingly easy to decipher the text, it certainly appears that one of the law firms involved could use a refresher on how to use their PDF editing software. (The document in question originated from Six4Three. Six4Three's law firm, Birnbaum & Godkin, could not immediately be reached for comment.)
However, it turns out properly redacting text can be more complex than you might think. "In theory this stuff does happen because there's a very wrong way to do redactions," says Cathy Gellis, a cyber lawyer based in Northern California, who is not affiliated with the Six4Three case.
Tweet may have been deleted
That might be why the District Court for Northern California, where the lawsuit was originally filed, has its own guide of do's and don'ts to help attorneys properly obscure sensitive information.
The "don't" section lists several methods that should not be used, such as simply changing the color of the font to white and deleting text without stripping the associated metadata. It also notes that some editing tools may appear to "black out" text even though it's actually still visible.
Whether or not that's what happened in this case is unclear. Though it wouldn't be the first time a simple error has blown up into an embarrassing mess. Earlier this month, a prosecutor accidentally revealed that the U.S. government had filed charges against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange when a U.S. attorney copy and pasted the wrong text into a court document. It was also revealed this year that the former chairman of Donald Trump's presidential campaign, Paul Manafort, accidentally created a paper trail documenting fraud because he didn't know how to convert a Microsoft Word document into a PDF.
For lawyers, though, the Six4Three case is a reminder of what can go wrong when the tools you use don't work the way you intend. Gellis notes that it's important for attorneys to be able to understand how these mistakes happen so they can better avoid them in the future. "Part of our job is to keep lots of information secret in a lot of ways. Every lawyer has to redact documents, and you want to believe you redacted them correctly."
For what it's worth, the District Court for Northern California does recommend one redaction method it promises "will always be 100% effective," and all you need is a good pair of scissors: "cut-out (literally) all the text to be redacted and properly dispose of (shred) the clippings."
Featured Video For You
Are humans actually supposed to like coffee?
(责任编辑:行业动态)
-
It's Unnecessary But, AMD Is Basically Lying About CPU Performance
Did you know that AMD's old Zen 3 architecture, released back in late 2019, is actually faster for g ...[详细] -
雅安日报讯19日,雨城区青江路社区联合辖区幼儿园,开展了以“喜迎党的十八大、老少同乐过重阳”为主题的联欢活动。一曲欢快的歌舞《越来越好》拉开了联欢会的序幕,社区文艺队的队员们抖起肩膀,转起舞扇,跳起轻 ...[详细]
-
喜报!17个国家水产新品种在水产种博会暨广东海洋牧场产业大会上正式发布
喜报!17个国家水产新品种在水产种博会暨广东海洋牧场产业大会上正式发布_南方+_南方plus11月25日,在2023中国水产种业博览会暨首届广东国际)现代化海洋牧场产业大会开幕式上,17个经国家审定的 ...[详细] -
22年前 “安安”“新兴”短暂停留新加坡100多天22年后 “武杰”“沪宝”将在新加坡生活10年9月5日,大熊猫“武杰”和“沪宝”将从中国保护大熊猫研究中心雅安碧峰峡基地启程前往新加坡,开始它们为期1 ...[详细]
-
现场观众驻足欣赏精美的蒙山窑瓷器用名山土,烧蒙山器,泡蒙山茶。8月24日,蒙山窑艺术馆开馆仪式在蒙顶山4A级旅游景区举行,一大批采用蒙顶山优质高岭土烧制的蒙山窑瓷器惊艳亮相,吸引了不少瓷器爱好者及游客 ...[详细]
-
雅安日报讯“叫我如何感谢你们啊,过节期间还这么麻烦你们,让我们避免了100多万元的损失……”6日凌晨,四川隆生农业发展有限公司乐英孵化场负责人拉着国家电网四川雅安电力(集团)股份有限公司始阳供电所员工 ...[详细]
-
汕尾展团风采·陆丰篇|荔枝、甘薯、大安蒜、菠萝、油柑来了!_南方+_南方plus编者按:汕尾美味,走进湾区。12月1-3日,在深圳对口帮扶协作汕尾指挥部的支持下,汕尾将组团参加2023全球高端食品及优 ...[详细]
-
全省唯一!韶关南雄喜添“国家重要湿地”生态名片_南方+_南方plus日前,国家林业和草原局发布新一批国家重要湿地名录,广东孔江国家湿地公园成功入选,系本批名录中唯一一处位于广东的国家重要湿地。记者获悉 ...[详细]
-
Kamala Harris’ ridiculous problem with the political press.
Last Thursday, standing on the tarmac in Michigan in front of Air Force Two, Kamala Harris took some ...[详细] -
欢送仪式上的节目表演再见“,武杰“”沪宝”昨(5)日下午,大熊猫“武杰”和“沪宝”踏上了前往新加坡定居的旅程。为了确保两只大熊猫有个清凉愉快的旅途,中国保护大熊猫研究中心和新加坡野生动物保育集团反复商 ...[详细]