[Weekender] The great gate debate
“Due to the indiscriminate actions of passersby within the complex, damage to residents such as trash throwing, unauthorized use of facilities, theft accidents and pet excretion continues to take place,” read the notice for the vote, asking residents to express their opinion through the poll on the installation of fences and a gate to limit the access of strangers.
Of 1,148 households in Gyeonghuigung Xi’s complex 2, which was built in 2017 in Jongno-gu, Seoul, 68 percent voted in favor.
“It was unpleasant to see people from outside drinking and making noise while sitting on benches in the complex where children are playing,” said a resident who voted for the fence installation. He declined to be named.
As is the norm with new apartment complexes in Korea, Gyeonghuigung Xi is not just a flock of tall residential towers. It has stylized shared gardens between buildings, walking and biking trails, water gardens, fountains, a cafe, library, gym and other community facilities.
His family pays about 300,000 won ($242) for their apartment maintenance fees per month. It includes costs for tending those community amenities and the use of outdoor elevators, which are often harnessed by nonresidents to take a shortcut to a nearby 50-year-old traditional market.
If not a physical fence, a psychological wall exists between some residents of new apartment complexes and their neighbors.
Five children who were playing at a playground of an apartment complex in Yeongjongdo, Incheon, were held at the apartment’s management office in October last year for playing in “someone else’s playground.”
The then leader of the residents’ council reported the children to police, alleging they damaged playground facilities. It was proven to be false based on footage from the surveillance camera installed there.
According to the children’s testimony, the man singled out children who didn‘t live in the apartment complex and called them “thieves” for coming to “someone else’s playground.”
The parents of the children sued him for intimidation and confinement. He lost his position through votes of the apartment residents.
Rise of gated communities
The two cases show a growing trend of apartment complexes turning into gated communities in a country nicknamed “the republic of apartments.”
The desire to secure a safe living space for residents of the complex by blocking the noise and potential danger stemming from the outside world is particularly strong among those living in newly-built apartments that feature posh amenities and well-designed landscape.
“People living in the same compound have been developing a unique type of community fellowship in big cities, as they share the same interest -- including home prices,” said Jung Heon-mok, an anthropology professor at the Academy of Korean Studies.
To be fair, gated communities are not a new thing. In many countries with a sharp gap between the rich and poor, wealthy residents congregate in gated communities, keeping themselves apart from the rest.
Yet, in Korea, competitions between construction companies to build prestigious and private apartments equipped with state of the art technology security systems, gardens and community centers have initiated the trend, experts said.
“A gated community may be needed to ensure security and safety in suburban areas, but the creation of a closed environment and complex in city areas has a negative impact on the existing urban ecosystem,” said Kim Do-nyun, an architecture professor at Sungkyunkwan University.
Blocking pavements and alleyways to a bus station that have been used by existing residents in the area for a long time before an apartment became nestled there is an example of a gated community that cuts off the city street network and causes an imbalance in living infrastructure.
Due to the gap between the existing residential area and an apartment complex, the notion of “neighborhood” disappears and the sense of community gets weakened, prompting social conflict, he added.
“What makes a good city is when there are many good roads. We have removed many roads in exchange for good houses,” Kim said.
Push for ‘social mix’
While private construction companies keep building up apartment complexes separating people in accordance with their social strata, public projects have been experimenting with ways to make them live together.
In 2003, the government announced a plan to enhance social integration in housing among income classes, in what is commonly called the social mix policy. It also aims to prevent the emergence and expansion of slums due to stratification in large cities.
Until then, when an apartment complex was built through a redevelopment project, a building for low-income or homeless people who rely on state funds to rent small-sized apartments was set up in a corner of the complex. Living in the same complex, a parking lot and playground were installed separately by those who were afford to buy an apartment with their own funds. The buildings were painted in different colors to visually distinguish who belongs where, causing discrimination and social exclusion.
The Seoul City government implemented the social mix policy on public housing projects first, and then applied to all urban renewal projects such as redevelopment and reconstruction since 2010.
The work is still in process. The number of public rental houses in Seoul nearly tripled from 10,223 in 2015 to 29,872 in 2020, according to data from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.
In the latest move, Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon mapped out a plan in January to prevent separation of apartment owners and public rental households by adopting a lottery system. Regardless of their types of house ownership, a tenant will get to pick the apartment number, floor and building of an apartment complex randomly. Lot-solid apartment owners used to have priority claim.
Social mixing policies are playing a role of laying groundwork for social consolidation as the housing problem is directly related to the social issues, said Kim Young-ook, architecture professor at Sejong University.
Making it impossible to judge income class based on physical appearance of a house alone is the ideal method, discovered by many developed countries after going through trial and error.
“The fundamental problem our society has is that people only see residential space as a product and investment vehicle,” he said.
“Housing is a space where people can learn about and internalize their social community, ethics and social support based on what kind of living environment they grow up in.”
(责任编辑:资讯)
推荐文章
-
Number Representations in Computer Hardware
Welcome to arguably the most fundamental component of computer design: how numbers are represented i ...[详细] -
8月10日晚,电闪雷鸣,瓢泼大雨化作滚滚洪流,一时间芦山县各地险情频频,道路被冲毁、农田被淹没、村庄被围困……芦山县应急管理局的办公室,各种声音环绕,接打电话声、敲打键盘声、打印机运转声……不时传来的 ...[详细]
-
銆€銆€杩戝勾鏉ワ紝閾惰鍗′綔涓轰竴绉嶉噾铻嶄骇鍝侊紝鍦ㄦ嫇瀹芥敮浠樻笭閬撱€佷績杩涙秷璐逛俊璐风瓑鏂归潰鍙戞尌浜嗛噸瑕佷綔鐢ㄣ€傚彲浠ヨ锛?ldquo;涓€鍗″湪鎵嬶紝鍚冨枬涓嶆剚” ...[详细]
-
火炬电子一季度业绩预增约50%火炬电子25日晚间披露2018年第一季度业绩预增公告。公司2018年第一季度预计实现归属于上市公司股东的净利润约为5,425万元,同比增加50%左右。*ST丹科2017年 ...[详细]
-
Jeffrey Arlo Brown ,July 31, 2024 The Comp ...[详细]
-
今年是《存款保险条例》实施五周年,在人行雅安中支的组织下,全市金融机构积极开展“存款保险知识进千家万户”活动,通过在网点设点、走进乡村和社区等方式,维护辖区金融环境。加强线上宣传扩大存款保险覆盖面“国 ...[详细]
-
雄狮少年上演龙眼争霸,千年民俗焕发新生丨非遗农韵_南方+_南方plus(雄狮少年上演龙眼争霸,千年民俗焕新生丨非遗农韵,时长共1分11秒)广东7月的夏天像火一样烈,在茂名高州储良龙眼母树公园内,黄斌武 ...[详细]
-
8月10日晚,电闪雷鸣,瓢泼大雨化作滚滚洪流,一时间芦山县各地险情频频,道路被冲毁、农田被淹没、村庄被围困……芦山县应急管理局的办公室,各种声音环绕,接打电话声、敲打键盘声、打印机运转声……不时传来的 ...[详细]
-
Elon Musk's AI facility is reportedly operating gas turbines without a permit
Elon Musk's AI company has caught the attention of environmentalists in Memphis, Tennessee for repor ...[详细] -
銆€銆€杩戝勾鏉ワ紝閾惰鍗′綔涓轰竴绉嶉噾铻嶄骇鍝侊紝鍦ㄦ嫇瀹芥敮浠樻笭閬撱€佷績杩涙秷璐逛俊璐风瓑鏂归潰鍙戞尌浜嗛噸瑕佷綔鐢ㄣ€傚彲浠ヨ锛?ldquo;涓€鍗″湪鎵嬶紝鍚冨枬涓嶆剚” ...[详细]
热点阅读