Katie Porter called her Senate race “rigged.” Was she a little right?
This is Totally Normal Quote of the Day, a feature highlighting a statement from the news that exemplifies just how extremely normal everything has become.
“Thank you to everyone who supported our campaign and voted to shake up the status quo in Washington. Because of you, we had the establishment running scared—withstanding 3 to 1 in TV spending and an onslaught of billionaires spending millions to rig this election.”
—A tweet sent by Rep. Katie Porter after she lost the California Senate primary
Rep. Katie Porter is not known in Washington for having a lot of friends. Nor, evidently, is she a gracious loser. After getting stomped in California’s Senate race Tuesday night by Democrat Adam Schiff and Schiff’s campaign ward, Republican Steve Garvey—who, it must be said over and over, didn’t have a campaign of his own—she weighed in rather bitterly:
“We had the establishment running scared,” she wrote on X, of her own campaign that fell far short, “withstanding 3 to 1 in TV spending and an onslaught of billionaires spending millions to rig this election.”
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementThank you to everyone who supported our campaign and voted to shake up the status quo in Washington. Because of you, we had the establishment running scared — withstanding 3 to 1 in TV spending and an onslaught of billionaires spending millions to rig this election. (1/)
— Katie Porter (@katieporteroc) March 6, 2024
That last verb perked up some ears! Porter’s would-have-been colleagues, Democratic Sens. Brian Shatz of Hawaii and Alex Padilla of California, pounced. Shatz tweeted: “The election in California was not rigged.” Padilla said her statement was blatantly “not true.”
It’s interesting. You don’t hear a lot of Democrats calling elections rigged these days. As political verbiage, it has been annexed by Trump and his enablers. The backlash to Porter’s tweet (which was voluminous) was clearly an emotional response to the word itself; it wasn’t just that Porter was a sore loser but that she implicated her fellow Democratic lawmakers in some level of MAGA-coded subterfuge. “Rigged,” terminologically speaking, seems to have a different valence after the 2020 election, and the subsequent attempt by Republicans to overturn it.
AdvertisementIn response, Porter doubled down by way of clarification: “Rigged means manipulated by dishonest means. A few billionaires spent $10 million+ on attack ads against me.”
Advertisement AdvertisementPlease find a statement from me below. pic.twitter.com/as8H2cHWL8
— Katie Porter (@katieporteroc) March 7, 2024
And the cycle repeated. (This time, even journalists at major outlets piled on to condemn her.)
Extricating the genuine outrage from some good old-fashioned dancing on the grave of a vanquished, not-entirely-beloved colleague is impossible here; there are elements of both at play. But … was Porter wrong? Everyone knows that money influences elections. Few things in politics are less controversial. And super PACs and billionaire megadonors didplay a major role in the California Senate race—regardless of whether “rigged” was the right way to describe it.
AdvertisementSchiff had tons and tons of money. So did Porter, albeit more from small-dollar donations. But one of Porter’s biggest nemeses, Fairshake PAC, was stood up by the cryptocurrency industry she so abhors. That PAC sunk $10 million into the race; half of it came from Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, the villain twins of the Facebook saga, who seemed to have it in for Porter on a personal level. Another Republican-backed influence operation, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, threw in $5 million for Schiff, possibly because Porter got tangled up in her messaging on the war in Gaza.
AdvertisementAgain, is that rigging? Maybe not, but it’s certainly putting a finger on the scale. And that was only a small part of the dealings that helped decide the race. As you can read here—tweet my piece, Katie!—Pelosi worked tirelessly in the background of the Senate race to secure the position for Schiff. She hammered fellow California House reps and orgs for endorsements and elevated him with her personal backing.
Advertisement AdvertisementRelated From Slate
Nitish Pahwa
It’s the State of the Union. Joe Biden Should Consider a Reset.
Read MoreRigged? OK, maybe that’s a little harsh. Or maybe Democrats can’t bear to hear that term anymore. But you won’t find a member of the party who doesn’t believe the basic fact that money influences elections, and that that should be reeled in.
AdvertisementPopular in News & Politics
- The Lawyer Defending Idaho’s Abortion Ban Irritated the One Justice He Needed on His Side
- We’ve Been Entertaining an Illusion About the Supreme Court. It’s Finally Been Shattered.
- You Don’t Want to Know How It’s Going Between Trump’s Lawyers and the Judge Presiding Over His Criminal Case
- Prosecutors Are Finally Revealing Their Strategy Against Trump
In fact, as commonplace as it is today to hear Democrats calling to overturn Dobbs, it has been equally commonplace in the last decade to hear Democrats call for action on a different Supreme Court decision: Citizens United, the ruling that led to the creation of super PACs and ushered in the modern era of unlimited political spending. The abolition of big money in politics has been a clarion call for elected Democrats for a long time; if anything, the dogpile on Porter is indicative of the sad fact that getting money out of politics has lost its priority status for Democrats—especially in the vaunted effort to defend democracy. (Since the Trump years began, Democrats have not infrequently enjoyed major fundraising advantages, perhaps blunting the urgency of that core principle in their minds.)
One of Porter’s few defenders online was Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig, who put it about as succinctly as one can. “Sure, it wasn’t ‘rigged’ in the sense that Trump means. But when did Trump-speak become obligatory?” posted Lessig. “What she said was true and fair, given her (correct) values about how this democracy is broken.”
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:产品中心)
- Pragmocracy Now
- 闈掑矝甯傚啗浼戣€佸勾澶у涓捐绉嬪瀛︽湡鏁欏笀鑱樹换浠紡
- 瑗挎捣宀告柊鍖虹彔娴疯閬擄細鏀归€犳彁鍗囨湇鍔″ぇ鍘 灞呮皯鍔炰簨鏇翠究鎹穇涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
- 青岛往事之中山路上“不服老”的老字号(一)
- NASA's new plan keeps Starliner astronauts in space until 2025
- DOJ accuses TikTok of collecting and sharing users' personal views, as the app fights a ban
- 在市南老城区有这样一片山海......
- 国庆假期即将来临 6条精品旅游线路让你畅游雅安
- 青岛市书法家协会五届十六次主席团扩大会议召开
- Giant dual
- 鏃呭閲忓闀?20%锛侀潚宀涙満鍦衡€滈潰鍚戞棩闊┾€濋棬鎴峰姛鑳芥寔缁彁鍗嘷涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
- 鈥滃缓璁句汉姘戞弧鎰忛摱琛屸€濈郴鍒楁姤閬撯€斺€旈潚宀涘伐琛岋細鐗规畩鏃舵湡瑙i毦棰 鐪熻瘹鏈嶅姟鏃犲浗鐣宊涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
- “青文驿”午间音乐会将高雅艺术送进楼宇
-
Trump won't stop making a deceptive bird claim. Experts debunk it.
Billions of birds are likely killed in the U.S. each year — but contrary to popular claims, wi ...[详细] -
“奔跑青岛,逐梦未来”,4月22日上午,2023青岛马拉松鸣枪开跑,来自全球数十个国家地区的2.5万余名运动员及马拉松爱好者齐聚“中国最美赛道”,感受青 ...[详细]
-
佛冈水头:创建全省一流中医药特色卫生院,打造“带不走的医疗队”
佛冈水头:创建全省一流中医药特色卫生院,打造“带不走的医疗队”_南方+_南方plus2024年中央一号文件提出了推进乡村全面振兴“路线图”,文件指出“加强乡镇卫生院和村卫生室服务能力建设”。乡镇医疗一 ...[详细] -
3月26日,由中国工程院指导、中国科学院青岛生物能源与过程研究所/山东能源研究院主办的《现代能源体系指数蓝皮书2022》发布会暨能源战略论坛在青岛举办。会上,全国首份《现代能源体系指数蓝皮书2022》 ...[详细]
-
Europe now has a huge AI gap, for better or for worse
When it comes to tech, Europe has been on a slightly separate track from the U.S. for a while, but t ...[详细] -
根据市文明委工作安排和市文明办、市教育局《关于开展2022年度雅安市文明校园创建申报、复核、转化工作的通知》雅市文明办〔2022〕8号)有关要求,市文明办、市教育局组织开展了20202022年雅安市文 ...[详细]
-
中国山东网-感知山东9月7日讯 在青岛曾流行一句顺口溜:“头戴盛锡福,脚踏新盛泰,身穿谦祥益,手戴亨得利,看戏上中和,洗澡天德堂,吃饭春和楼,看病宏仁堂。”而这说的正是中山路上 ...[详细]
-
中国平安300亿保额护航深圳马拉松,长期支持中国体育事业发展
中国山东网—感知山东2月23日讯2月19日,2022深圳马拉松(以下简称“深马”)圆满落幕。作为本届深圳马拉松官方战略合作伙伴也是唯一保险赞助商,中国平安为参与本次 ...[详细] -
Aricell CEO arrested in first case under industrial accidents law
Aricell CEO Park Soon-kwan is escorted to a detention center after attending an arrest warrant heari ...[详细] -
兴农评丨又食又拎 年味留存_南方+_南方plus(兴农评,时长共1分42秒)兔去雄风在,龙来福气多。三农大小事,尽在兴农评。广州亲戚,又食又拎。不带上土特产踏上打工归途,这个年就不能说过完。在村里过年 ...[详细]