People aren't cool with the LAPD getting drones
Forget 2049. Los Angeles' Blade Runner-esque future of a world watched by robots is here.
On Tuesday, a civilian oversight panel gave the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) the OK to begin a year-long drone trial, primarily for reconnaissance in "tactical missions" conducted by SWAT.
The decision came after a contentious meeting and protest by privacy advocates who oppose the use of drones by law enforcement.
SEE ALSO:Only in Dubai—police now have hovercraftsAs the third largest police force in the nation behind New York and Chicago, the trial makes the LAPD the largest police force in the nation to use drones. The Chicago PD and New York PD confirmed in official statements to Mashablethat neither police force deploys drones.
But that doesn't mean drone use by law enforcement isn't already widespread. According to an April 2017 study from Bard College's Center for the Study of the Drone, at least 347 state and local police, sheriff, fire, and emergency units in the U.S. have acquired drones, with local law enforcement agencies taking the largest share of the drone pie.
According to the Los Angeles Times, the LAPD will use camera-mounted drones for reconnaissance purposes, not general surveillance or as weapons. They will only be deployed during missions undertaken by SWAT that have been deemed particularly dangerous. And the LAPD has promised stringent limitations and oversight. The LAPD did not immediately respond to Mashablewhen asked about the benefits provided and risks posed by the use of drones.
The LAPD initially received two drones from the Seattle PD in 2014, but quickly retired them after public outcry, according to a report from the Los Angeles Times.
But the privacy and surveillance concerns that grounded the "Unmanned Aerial Systems" in 2014 resurfaced during the civilian oversight panel. Video depicts jeers from the audience at the oversight meeting, coupled with disbelief that the LAPD would make good on self-imposed drone use restrictions.
Tweet may have been deleted
ACLU attorney Melanie Ochoa said that mistrust of the LAPD is at core of community and organizational opposition to the drone pilot program. She said that skepticism that the LAPD will abide by its own drone guidelines stems from their past use of advanced surveillance technology without widespread community knowledge. Additionally, the alleged misuse of the SWAT team in low-level drug busts contributes to fear that drones have the potential to be deployed beyond the limited "tactical" missions for which they have been designated.
"The community has to have real faith in their law enforcement that they're not going to abuse that technology any time that drones are being incorporated into law enforcement," Ochoa said. "And unfortunately that is not present in Los Angeles."
Tweet may have been deleted
Ochoa also said the ACLU and public opposed the use of drones because the commission was not executed in good faith. Just 7 percent of citizens who responded during the public comment period were in favor of drone use by police.
"On its face the LAPD engaged in an open public process for soliciting input on drones before it adopted a specific policy," Ochoa said. "But in reality it appears that much of the process was just a farce and it doesn't seem that the police commission ever actually intended to respond to the public's views."
People protested in the streets to oppose the drone policy and test.
Tweet may have been deleted
Citing surveillance concerns and lack of public responsiveness, organizations such as #BlackLivesMatter-LA and the Stop LAPD Spying Coalition have also spoken out against the decision.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Groups such as the ACLU will continue monitoring the use of drones throughout the year-long pilot.
Later, if the public continues to oppose the use of drones, Ochoa said, "Then hopefully the commission will actually be responsive to their concerns and see that they have not been alleviated through the pilot program."
Tweet may have been deleted
Though Ochoa sees how drones could be useful in policing for surveillance on dangerous missions, she does not see that as justification for the program's implementation in the wake of the public's privacy concerns. And when asked whether the ACLU thinks the potential risks to privacy outweigh the potential benefits to law enforcement, Ochoa said, "Yes. And if that's not true, it has not been shown otherwise."
"I think the fact that something can be useful," Ochoa said, "should not be the sole criteria by which we are judging whether or not police should have some kind of technology."
Featured Video For You
Fully autonomous vehicles could be coming to California roads
(责任编辑:产品中心)
-
Noelle Mateer ,July 17, 2024 The Techies W ...[详细]
-
16名选手晋级!湛江赛区决赛周末唱响 | 2023广东乡村歌手大赛_南方+_南方plus近日,广东乡村歌手大赛湛江赛区复赛正式落下帷幕。经过激烈角逐,16位选手脱颖而出,成功晋级湛江赛区半决赛。十六强 ...[详细]
-
张勇:广东供应了全国80%以上鳜鱼种苗!“鼎鳜1号”今年推广约5000万尾丨芯时代 最强音
张勇:广东供应了全国80%以上鳜鱼种苗!“鼎鳜1号”今年推广约5000万尾丨芯时代 最强音_南方+_南方plus编者按:水产种业是现代渔业的“芯片”,也是渔业的战略性、基础性核心产业。11月24-26 ...[详细] -
雅安日报讯13日,“秋老虎”持续发威,热浪袭人,室外温度超过35摄氏度,加之名山县全城停气,负荷激增,导致该县城区部分变压器达到承载极限。当日上午11时45分,国家电网雅安名山供电有限责任公司配网运检 ...[详细]
-
In 2007, Flickr was the most popular dedicated photo-sharing site on the web, and growing exponentia ...[详细]
-
雅安日报讯“大家都说世上只有妈妈好,但我的妈妈为什么不爱我?”“妈妈,你听说过七色花的故事吗?七色花的花瓣可以许愿。”“妈妈,你的眼睛又流汗了。你很热吗?”这几句台词,都出自于近日由雅女李诗怡自编自导 ...[详细]
-
雅安日报讯近日,市民王刚致电本报新闻热线2222226,称自己是成都人,在雅安上班,“五险一金”都在雅安购买,准备在成都购置房产,不知道是否可以用住房公积金在成都贷款买房。记者咨询市住房公积金管理中心 ...[详细]
-
雅安日报讯7月31日中午,随着施工人员将隔离施工区域的铁皮围栏打开,封闭施工了20天的雅州廊桥北端路段提前10天恢复通行,加上之前南端桥头路段恢复通行,因雅州廊桥副桥工程桥头路面接顺施工而封闭的市区河 ...[详细]
-
Carbon neutrality law violates basic rights: Constitutional Court
South Korea's carbon neutrality law does not conform with the Constitution because the absence ...[详细] -
喻佳丽参加《歌声传奇》现场献唱10日晚,2011年“快乐女声”全国九强之一的“雅女”喻佳丽,现身山东卫视的综艺节目《歌声传奇》并献唱。该节目是通过PK淘汰的赛制,评选出在每一期《歌声传奇》中表现的优异 ...[详细]